Monday, December 8, 2014

Paper Review #13: SketchREAD

1. Paper Bibliography


  • TitleSketchREAD: A Multi-Domain Sketch Recognition Engine
  • AuthorsAlvarado, Christine, and Randall Davis.
  • PublicationProceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 2004.

2. Summary

  • Provide structure description of the shapes in a certain domain (No training data or programming is necessary.)
  • Context
    • Guide the search for possible interpretations
    • Reclassify low-level shapes
    • Effect:
      • Reduce recognition errors 
      • Robustness to ambiguity and uncertainty inherent in complex, freely-drawn sketches
  • Bayesian network
    • Use a novel form of dynamically constructed Bayesian networks to evaluate these interpretation
    • Effect:
      • Recover from low-level recognition level
  • Target domains: family trees and circuit diagram

3. Terminology

  • Interpretation
  • Hypothesis

4. Details

  • The description of a shape
  • Recognition
    • Problem
      • Real-time system -> Noise -> low-level misinterpretation -> higher-level interpretation fail
      • Guarantee all interpretation -> exponential cases
    • Solution
      • Bottom-up recognition
        • Generate most likely interpretation first
      • Top-down
        • Seek out missing interpretations
      • Bayesian Network
        • Evaluate partial interpretation hypotheses 
        • Expand the hypothesis space by exploring the most likely interpretation first
  • Hypothesis Evaluation
    • A directed acyclic graph
      • Which factors influence each other
    • A set of conditional probability distributions
      • How these factors influence one another
  • Hypothesis Generation
    • Top-down, Bottom-up, Pruning
  • Selecting an Interpretation


5. Evaluation

  • Circuit diagram is longer than family tree.

2 comments:

  1. Very clear summary. You gave a nice picture about what the paper developed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great paper summary! I like the way how you structured the paper. Clear and straightforward. Good use of figures to explain the concepts.

    ReplyDelete